No Borders News
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. News
  4. /
  5. California
California

CA AG Bonta urges U.S. Supreme Court to protect due process for long-term immigrant detainees

calendar_monthPublished on September 8, 2026schedule4 min read
gavel

California

Enforcement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in a case about due process for immigrant detainees. The filing supports the idea that people held in civil immigration detention for very long periods should receive an individualized bond hearing.

The case discussed in the brief, Genalo v. GM, involves a legal permanent resident who was detained for about 21 months while his immigration court proceedings were pending, without a bond hearing. The argument presented is that prolonged detention without an individualized assessment can violate the Fifth Amendment right to due process.

According to the press release, the Second Circuit agreed with that view. The brief urges the Supreme Court to keep that decision in place, emphasizing that when detention becomes unreasonably prolonged, the government should have to justify continued detention through an individualized process.

The Attorney General also points to conditions in detention facilities and argues that long-term detention of noncitizens who do not pose a danger or risk of flight is unconstitutional. The filing asks the Supreme Court to prevent what it describes as unnecessary and prolonged “mass detention” while people await outcomes in removal proceedings.

This is not a final ruling by the Supreme Court, but it is a signal that California is asking the Court to preserve stronger due process protections for detainees facing long periods of confinement without bond hearings. For the most accurate details, readers may want to review the official amicus brief and the Supreme Court docket for the case.

What This Means for You

  • California is asking the Supreme Court to require individualized bond hearings for people held in immigration detention for unreasonably long periods.
  • The brief focuses on detainees who are not alleged to be dangerous and not alleged to be flight risks.
  • The Supreme Court has not decided the case yet, so the outcome could change.
  • If the Second Circuit’s approach is upheld, it could affect how long-term detainees are reviewed for continued detention.

This is not legal advice. Always verify with the official source and consult a qualified attorney for your situation.

Read the official source

mail

Stay Informed

Immigration policies change rapidly. Join the waitlist for localized alerts in your language. Sending comes later — we only store your email for now.

Source: California Attorney General — News · No Borders News

No Borders News

© 2026 No Borders News. Accessibility-first immigration news.

About UsHelp CenterPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

Privacy first: no accounts, no tracking. Preferences stay on this device. We never sell your email.

  • homeHome
  • helpHelp Center